NL: Landmark Digitization Agreement

P R E S S R E L E A S E
Utrecht, 30 January 2009

Digitisation of heritage collections comes closer
Unique agreement between libraries and right holders

Dutch libraries, archives, and museums recently reached agreement with right holders on the digitisation and accessibility of their heritage collections. The organisations representing the libraries (FOBID) and the right holders (VOI©E) reached agreement within the Digiti©E Committee (Digitisation of Cultural Heritage) that was set up when a Declaration of Intent was signed at the opening of Amsterdam World Book Capital in April 2008. The agreement is a major breakthrough in the discussion regarding the copyright aspects of digitising collections held by libraries and archives.

As far as is known, this is the first agreement of this type anywhere in the world between libraries and right holders. There is concern in many other countries too regarding how to deal with the rights of right holders who cannot be traced, i.e. the holders of rights in “orphan works”. If the arrangement that has now been accepted in the Netherlands is imitated in other European countries, it will have an enormous effect on the availability of recent works in the “Europeana” digital library.

Right holders
Libraries and archives manage large collections that are important from the cultural and historical perspective. The development of digital technology basically allows those collections to be made available to the general public via the Internet. The European Commission recently launched the “Europeana” digital library, which is hosted by the National Library of the Netherlands in The Hague. The vast majority of the documents that have so far been digitised are from before the 20th century. The main reason for this limitation is that more recent works are still protected by copyright, meaning that they can only be digitised and distributed with the consent of the right holders. Tracing the right owner is a time-consuming and consequently costly process. Moreover, it often proves impossible to actually find the right owner, and so many libraries simply do not bother to try.

In their Declaration of Intent signed last April, the parties already noted that they recognised this problem and wished to cooperate in solving it; this is provided for in the recent agreement.

Essence
The essence of the agreement is that the libraries that are represented receive permission, on certain conditions, from virtually all right holders to digitise their collections and make them publically available on their own premises for teaching or research purposes. The works concerned must be part of the Dutch cultural heritage and no longer commercially available. The libraries do not need to pay the right holders as long as the works are only made available on their own premises.

Separate consent is required, however, if the digitised works are made more widely available, for example by means of remote access or via the Internet. In that case, an agreed payment must be made; agreements in principle can be made regarding payment by the Digiti©E committee. Even then, the library will not need to go in search of the right holders because this will be done by collecting societies such as Lira and Pictoright.

The organisations representing right holders will shortly be setting up a Registration Centre for digitisation where libraries and archives can register proposed projects and get in touch with right holders regarding how they should be implemented.

Individual right holders can naturally still object to their work being digitised and made accessible. In that case, the libraries and archives concerned are required to cease making the works accessible; in practice, very few titleholders actually object.

Kees Holierhoek, the chairman of the Lira copyright holders’ organisation and of the digital right holders working party, has this to say about the new agreement: “I’m very pleased about this agreement. It’s important for us that copyright should be respected, and that has been done in this case. At the same time, the agreement has done away with a major obstacle to making texts and photos accessible. Authors, freelance journalists, photographers, and publishers will all have a veto right if they do not wish to participate. If they do wish to participate, they can claim payment if their material is made accessible outside the institution’s own premises.”

Martin Bossenbroek, the acting General Director of the National Library of the Netherlands, says: “This agreement is a real breakthrough. It’s extremely good news for libraries like the National Library of the Netherlands whose core task is to manage nationally important heritage collections and make them available. The agreement regulates digitisation and the availability of digitised collections on our own premises. But that is only the first step, because we naturally want to also make the digitised collections available online. I think the real benefit of this agreement is that it shows how all the various interested parties understand one another’s positions and arguments. That constructive attitude will also make it possible to arrive at good follow-up arrangements for provision of material on the Internet.”

For more information, please go to the text of the declaration by the organisations of right holders: http://sitegenerator.bibliotheek.nl/fobid/overig29/overig50.asp

About VOI©E
VOI©E (Netherlands Association of Organisations for the Collective Management of Intellectual Property Rights) is the sector organisation that deals with copyright and neighbouring rights.

About FOBID
FOBID (Netherlands Library Forum) is the national alliance of Dutch library organisations:
• Netherlands Public Library Association;
• NVB (Netherlands Association of Professionals in the Library, Information, and Knowledge Sector);
• UKB (consortium of the thirteen Dutch university libraries);
• National Library of the Netherlands.

More information
Please contact
Michel Frequin, director of VOI©E
Tel. +31 (0)70 310 9109 or +31 (0)6 5144 2153

or

Nol Verhagen, chair of FOBID’s Legal Committee
Tel. +31 (0)20 525 2307 or +31 (0)6 1129 2816

http://www.sitegenerator.bibliotheek.nl/fobid/img/docs/DigitiCE%20Persbericht%20ENGELS.doc

Bildrechte: Neue Entwicklungen

Peter Suber stellt zwei neue Initiativen für Open Access zu Public-Domain-Kunst vor:

http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/01/two-approaches-to-oa-for-public-domain.html

Zu den Prado-Bildern (gratis OA) in Google Earth – http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5446396 – wird ein Kommentar verlinkt:

http://exacteditions.blogspot.com/2009/01/google-pictures-and-google-books.html

Interessanter ist ein Beitrag über ein Projekt der englischsprachigen Wikipedia „Wikipedia loves art“ (libre OA), das dazu auffordert im Februar in 14 US-Museen und dem V&A-Museum zu Wikipedia-Illustrationszwecken PD-Kunst zu fotografieren:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WLART

Üblicherweise stellen sich viele Museen (bzw. Archive, Bibliotheken) entsetzlich an, wenn es um Fotos ihrer Bestände an. Dass es anders geht, beweist nunmehr nicht mehr nur Flickr Commons (und die Bundesarchiv-Bildspende an die Wikipedia), sondern auch dieser löbliche Wettbewerb.

Zum Grundsätzlichen:

http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/4477824

Open Access vom Brandenburgischen Landesgesetzgeber als zukunftsweisend angesehen

Im neuen brandenburgischen Hochschulgesetz vom 18. Dezember 2008 findet sich in § 68 Abs. 1 S. 3 BbgHG dieser bemerkenswerte Satz:

„Sie [die Hochschulbibliothek] fördert den freien Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Informationen.“
Vgl. GVBl. Brandenburg Teil I 2008/17, S. 318

Der Gesetzgeber führt dazu in den Materialen aus:

„Das brandenburgische Recht bezieht sich ausdrücklich auf den Ansatz des ‚open access‘, der als zukunftsweisend eingestuft wird.“
Vgl. LT-Drs. 4/6419 zu § 68.

http://wissenschaftsurheberrecht.blog.de/2009/01/30/open-access-brandenburgischen-hochschulgesetz-5474213

Akten werden dem Bundesarchiv entzogen

Vernichten statt veröffentlichen

Helmut Lorscheid 31.01.2009

Wie die Bundesregierung mit vertraulichen Akten umgeht
Trotz Informationsfreiheitsgesetz im Bund und mittlerweile auch in den meisten Bundesländern,. Sollen Geheimakten auf alle Zeit auch geheim bleiben. Was in den Bundesbehörden einmal zu einer Verschlusssache gestempelt wurde, soll auch gegenüber der Öffentlichkeit verschossen bleiben. Das geht aus der Antwort der Bundesregierung hervor, die FDP-Fraktion erhielt.

Weiterlesen:

http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/29/29625/1.html

Zum Thema hier:

http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5400283
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5341239

Geschichte Aachens

Ende 2006 wurde in Aachen Straße nach dem Priester,
Oberlehrer, Bibliothekar, Stadtarchivar und
Geschichtsschreiber von Aachen, Christian Quix, geb. 08. 10. 1773,
gestorben am 13. 01. 1844 benannt.

Die Stadtgeschichte von Quix Bd. 1, 1840 ist nun in Göttingen als DigiWunschbuch online:

http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?PPN588475165

Derjenige, der dieses Buch auf eigene Kosten digitalisieren liess, hätte einfach auf

http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Aachen

nachschauen können, dass das gesamte Werk seit 2008 in Düsseldorf bereitsteht:

http://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/periodical/titleinfo/164458