Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access

https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.23.164004 (Preprint)

„We studied journal articles published by researchers at all eight of New Zealand universities in 2017 to determine how many were freely accessible on the web. We wrote software code to harvest data from multiple sources, code that we now share to enable others to reproduce our work on their own sample set. In May 2019, we ran our code to determine which of the 2017 articles were open at that time and by what method; where those articles would have incurred an Article Processing Charge (APC) we calculated the cost if those charges had been paid. Where articles were not freely available we determined whether the policies of publishers in each case would have allowed deposit in a non-commercial repository (Green open access). We also examined average citation rates for different types of access. We found that, of our 2017 sample set, about two out of every five articles were freely accessible without payment or subscription (41%). Where research was explicitly said to be funded by New Zealand’s major research funding agencies, the proportion was slightly higher at 49%. Where open articles would have incurred an APC we estimated an average cost per article of USD1,682 (for publications where all articles require an APC, that is, Gold open access) and USD2,558 (where APC payment is optional, Hybrid open access) at a total estimated cost of USD1.45m. Of the paid options, Gold is by far more common for New Zealand researchers (82% Gold, 18% Hybrid). Where articles were not freely accessible we found that a very large majority of them (88%) could have been legally deposited in an institutional repository. In terms of average citation rates, we found Green and Hybrid open access to achieve the highest rates, higher than other forms of open access and higher still than research that is only available via payment. Given that most New Zealand researchers support research being open, there is clearly a large gap between belief and practice in New Zealand’s research ecosystem, despite a clear citation advantage for open access over research that is not freely accessible.“

Open Access nur für die Betuchten?

Ein Rant von Steinhauer:

New from eLife: Invitation to submit to Preprint Review

„[A]uthors who have shared their work as a preprint on bioRxiv are invited to submit to eLife’s new Preprint Review service. Initially detailed by Editor-in-Chief Michael Eisen last year, Preprint Review offers authors the opportunity to have eLife review their work directly on bioRxiv and, simultaneously, consider the work for publication in the journal.“

https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/d0c5d114/new-from-elife-invitation-to-submit-to-preprint-review

Recht und Zugang

Open-Access-Buch mit mehr als einer Million Leser/-innen

„Das wissenschaftliche Kompendium „Klimawandel in Deutschland: Entwicklung, Folgen, Risiken und Perspektiven“ wurde bis heute mehr als eine Million Mal heruntergeladen. Das Buch steht im Open Access zur Verfügung und war Ende 2016 unter einer CC-BY-Lizenz erschienen, herausgegeben von Wissenschaftler/-innen des Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS), einer Einrichtung des Helmholtz-Zentrums Geesthacht.“

https://os.helmholtz.de/bewusstsein-schaerfen/newsletter/archiv/newsletter-79-vom-22042020/