Digital resources in the Social Sciences and Humanities OpenEdition Our platforms OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypotheses Calenda Libraries OpenEdition Freemium Follow us

Kritik an Academia.edu geht weiter

https://fsulib.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/acasocialnetworks/

Repositories like DigiNole create the opportunity for easier access to scholarly work, meaning that more people can download and cite it, unlike Academia.edu and ResearchGate, which both require log-ins to view material in full.

Institutional repositories have the potential to allow for greater flexibility in sharing scholars’ work. Since sites like Academia.edu do not allow for data harvesting, information/publications on the site are kept locked away. Repositories, on the other hand, do not restrict how the data about hosted research products is used, which allows for integration with other services like figshare, Impactstory, and ORCID. Relaying on a more open scholarship network, researchers can more easily share their scholarship, record its impact, and find new and related work.


OpenEdition schlägt Ihnen vor, diesen Beitrag wie folgt zu zitieren:
Klaus Graf (13. Dezember 2015). Kritik an Academia.edu geht weiter. Archivalia. Abgerufen am 25. März 2025 von https://doi.org/10.58079/c2zf


Autor: Klaus Graf

Historiker und Archivar, Blogger

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.