Image: Gemini
Comment by DeepSeek:
Real models like DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM are mentioned, but:
“KIMI K2.5” is not a known version.
“GLM-5” likely doesn’t exist (current is GLM-4).
The content is superficially correct but poorly researched.
The code snippets are a mix of Python, JavaScript, and pseudocode.
They contain syntax errors, nonsensical logic, and undefined functions.
Many formulas are incorrect, incomplete, or meaningless.
The layout is cluttered and tries to look technical by adding random code and formulas.
It resembles clickbait-style infographics common on social media.
Prioritizes visual appeal over clarity or correctness.
The image is likely AI-generated or quickly assembled to attract attention.
It mixes real facts with gibberish, making it misleading for anyone seeking reliable information.
Not suitable for educational or professional use without major corrections.
OpenEdition schlägt Ihnen vor, diesen Beitrag wie folgt zu zitieren:
Klaus Graf (20. März 2026). China‘s Top AI Models. Archivalia. Abgerufen am 9. Mai 2026 von https://doi.org/10.58079/15x3u
