“Banning flash for preservation reasons is an overreaction”

Most, if not all, consumer-grade camera flashes emit a level and spectrum of light that is relatively insignificant in terms of harming library, museum, or archives materials.

Here is a link to Stephan Michalski’s oft-cited article that makes this assertion:

http://cool.conservation-us.org/byorg/abbey/an/an20/an20-6/an20-607.html

Though the cumulative effects of several flash exposures over many (many, many, many) years might indeed accelerate degradation of certain pigments, the same can be said for the repeated physical handling of any particular object – including exposure to normal room lighting conditions.

I think banning flash for preservation reasons is an overreaction.

Thomas Blake (archives-L)



Diesen Blogbeitrag zitieren
Klaus Graf (2010, 22. Januar). “Banning flash for preservation reasons is an overreaction” Archivalia. Abgerufen am 29. Februar 2024, von https://doi.org/10.58079/bt8m

Autor: Klaus Graf

Historiker und Archivar, Blogger

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.

Suche in OpenEdition Search

Sie werden weitergeleitet zur OpenEdition Search