“OCR4all is better than Google”

http://researchfragments.blogspot.com/2023/05/ocr4all-is-better-than-google.html

“OCR4all is better than Google OCR for early modern printed books.

Klaus Graf pointed me to a suggestion from Lajos Adamik on using Google Docs for OCR. It’s a great idea – Google is fast and fairly accurate. For some projects I’d definitely use it.

But not for most early printed books.”



Diesen Blogbeitrag zitieren
Klaus Graf (2023, 31. Mai). “OCR4all is better than Google” Archivalia. Abgerufen am 22. April 2024, von https://doi.org/10.58079/ci04

Autor: Klaus Graf

Historiker und Archivar, Blogger

Ein Gedanke zu „“OCR4all is better than Google”“

  1. I completely agree with you. Google also has the “weakness” that you can only convert one image at a time. In addition, the quality of the OCR depends strongly on the print quality of the original, independent of the platform you use. With these limitations, I can still recommend Google with a clear conscience.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.

Suche in OpenEdition Search

Sie werden weitergeleitet zur OpenEdition Search