https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
“ChatGPT writes believable scientific abstracts, though with completely generated data. These are original without any plagiarism detected but are often identifiable using an AI output detector and skeptical human reviewers. Abstract evaluation for journals and medical conferences must adapt policy and practice to maintain rigorous scientific standards; we suggest inclusion of AI output detectors in the editorial process and clear disclosure if these technologies are used.”
OpenEdition schlägt Ihnen vor, diesen Beitrag wie folgt zu zitieren:
Klaus Graf (28. Dezember 2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts. Archivalia. Abgerufen am 22. März 2025 von https://doi.org/10.58079/ch65