Open Peer Review wächst, ist aber noch weit entfernt von selbstverständlicher Praxis
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae004
Suchergebnisse für: peer review
Could AI Disrupt Peer Review?
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-peer-review See also https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/amid-high-profits-and-falling-wages-peer-reviewers-must-be-paid (Paywall)
The Role of Preprint Peer Review
https://oaspa.org/webinar-shaping-the-future-of-scholarly-communication-the-role-of-preprint-peer-review/
Kein Peer Review
Musste gerade an das Jahrbuch der Hamburger Kunsthalle denken, eine der besten Zeitschriften in der #Kunstgeschichte. Kein #peerreview, Qualität ausschließlich durch die beiden Herausgeber garantiert: Werner Hofmann und Martin Warnke — Hubertus Kohle (@hkohle) June 30, 2023
Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?
PAYWALL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00447-z
Now all PeerJ articles will be published with their entire peer review history
https://peerj.com/blog/post/115284886994/
Double-anonymized peer review is not the progressive answer to status bias
Horbach et al.: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fqb5c “Opting for double-anonymized peer review has far-reaching implications. It hinders the adoption of important open science practices, including fast dissemination through preprint servers, early sharing of protocols and data sets, and transparency about competing interests. As such, double-anonymized peer review impedes innovation in scholarly publishing. Crucial innovative developments such as preprinting, … „Double-anonymized peer review is not the progressive answer to status bias“ weiterlesen
eLife ends accept/reject decisions following peer review
https://elifesciences.org/for-the-press/b2329859/elife-ends-accept-reject-decisions-following-peer-review From January 31, 2023, eLife will instead publish every paper it reviews as a Reviewed Preprint, a new type of research output that combines the manuscript with eLife’s detailed peer reviews and a concise assessment of the significance of the findings and quality of the evidence. Michael Eisen, eLife Editor-in-Chief, says: “By relinquishing the … „eLife ends accept/reject decisions following peer review“ weiterlesen
PLOS ONE to retract more than 100 papers for manipulated peer review
https://retractionwatch.com/2022/08/03/exclusive-plos-one-to-retract-more-than-100-papers-for-manipulated-peer-review/
“The peer review system is broken”
https://theconversation.com/the-peer-review-system-is-broken-we-asked-academics-how-to-fix-it-187034
Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to recommend their own peer reviewers
https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/scientists-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-recommend-their-own-peer-reviewers-1752be611f63
Innovationen in Sachen Peer Review
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/8hdxu
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2
Writing an open peer review
http://blogs.reading.ac.uk/open-research/2021/10/30/openpeerreview/
Tipps zum Peer Review
https://progressivegeographies.com/2021/10/18/journal-peer-review-is-increasingly-challenged-there-are-no-easy-solutions-but-heres-a-few-thoughts/
Open Peer Review?
Mixed feelings about open peer review. Yes to all the benefits cited by others. But anonymity has benefits too.1. It protects women, minority, & young/unknown authors from referee bias.2. It protects the same scholars as referees when criticizing weak work by senior scholars. — Peter Suber (@petersuber) July 6, 2021
Wissenschaftsphilosophen wollen Peer Review abschaffen
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz029
How can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?
https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.24.918995
Peer Review: Große Probleme, Reviewer zu finden
Ein Journal hat die Aufnahme von Beiträgen zeitweilig eingestellt, um den Rückstand aufzuarbeiten: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/08/16/major-higher-education-research-journal-suspending-submissions-clear-out-two-year Lösungen aus meiner Sicht: Preprint-Server und Open Peer Review.
Von Fake Journals zu Fake News: Ausweg Open Peer Review?
Leonhard Dobusch und Maximilian Heimstädt: Von Fake Journals zu Fake News: Ausweg Open Peer Review?, in: Synergie: Fachmagazin Für Digitalisierung in der Lehre, Heft 5, S. 42-47 https://www.synergie.uni-hamburg.de/de/media/ausgabe05/synergie05-beitrag07-dobusch-heimstaedt.pdf Via http://www.univie.ac.at/voeb/blog/?p=46697
Peer Review bei Wellcome Open Research
http://asapbio.org/kiley-wellcome Es funktioniert! Allerdings öffnet die Vorgabe, dass die Autoren die Peer-Reviewer auswählen, dem Missbrauch Tür und Tor. Beispiel für einen noch am ehesten medizinhistorisch zu bezeichnenden Artikel: Miller G. David Stafford-Clark (1916-1999): Seeing through a celebrity psychiatrist [version 1; referees: 3 approved]. Wellcome Open Res 2017, 2:30 (doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.11411.1)
Grundlagenliteratur zu Peer Review
http://asapbio.org/six-essential-reads-on-peer-review
Mehrheit von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern befürwortet Open Peer Review
https://www.sub.uni-goettingen.de/sub-aktuell/einzelansicht/studie-zeigt-mehrheit-von-wissenschaftlerinnen-und-wissenschaftlern-befuerwortet-open-peer-review/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311
Make reviews public, says peer review expert
http://retractionwatch.com/2017/11/27/make-reviews-public-says-peer-review-expert/ Irene Hames: I don’t think that saying something is ‘peer reviewed’ can any longer be considered a badge of quality or rigour. The quality of peer review varies enormously, ranging from excellent through poor/inadequate to non-existent. But if reviewers’ reports were routinely published alongside articles – ideally with the authors’ responses and editorial decision … „Make reviews public, says peer review expert“ weiterlesen
What is Open Peer Review?
“Open peer review is an umbrella term for a number of overlapping ways that peer review models can be adapted in line with the ethos of Open Science, including making reviewer and author identities open, publishing review reports and enabling greater participation in the peer review process. The full list of traits is: Open identities: … „What is Open Peer Review?“ weiterlesen
Ist die Zeit für Open Peer Review gekommen?
https://www.researchinformation.info/feature/exposing-peer-review “When Nature launched a trial of open peer review in June 2006, its editors and publishers felt peer review was ‘never perfect’ and the time was right to ‘explore a more participative approach’. But minimal uptake meant that come the end of the trial, Nature director, Timo Hannay, had decided scientists ‘weren’t ready’ for … „Ist die Zeit für Open Peer Review gekommen?“ weiterlesen
Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories
http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12171
Open Peer Review: Antisemitismus im 19. Jahrhundert aus internationaler Perspektive
https://antisem19c.hypotheses.org/publications-open-peer-review “Die Kommentare werden von den Herausgebern des Bandes erst nach vorheriger Prüfung freigeschaltet. Eine Namensnennung ist erforderlich, anonyme Kommentare werden nicht veröffentlicht. Wir bitten, die im wissenschaftlichen Austausch angebrachte Höflichkeit und Sachlichkeit zu berücksichtigen.” Schade, da kann ich ja nicht mitmachen …
Open Peer Review: Wie permanent sind Permalinks?
http://informationspraxis.de/2016/10/17/open-peer-review-wie-permanent-sind-permalinks/ Ich habe mich bei hypothes.is angemeldet und etliche Anmerkungen hinterlassen (was auch andere getan haben).