Der folgende Auszug aus dem jüngsten HathiTrust-Urteil illustriert die Flexibilität des us-amerikanischen Fair-use-Systems: “Under the fair‐use doctrine, a book reviewer may, for example, quote from an original work in order to illustrate a point and substantiate criticisms, see Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342, 344 C.C.D. Mass. 1841) (No. 4901), and a biographer may quote from unpublished journals and letters for similar purposes, see Wright v. Warner Books, Inc., 953 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1991). An artist may employ copyrighted photographs in a new work that uses a fundamentally different artistic approach, aesthetic, and character from the original. See Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694, 706 (2d Cir. 2013). An internet search engine can display low‐resolution versions of copyrighted images in order to direct the user to the website where the original could be found. See Perfect 10, Inc. v. http://Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, 1165 (9th Cir. 2007); Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 818‐22 (9th Cir. 2002). A newspaper can publish a copyrighted photograph (taken for a modeling portfolio) in order to inform and entertain the newspaper’s readership about a news story. See Nunez v. Caribbean Intʹl News Corp., 235 F.3d 18, 25 (1st Cir. 2000). A viewer can create a … „Fair Use in den USA“ weiterlesen
